“Narco-Terrorism”: Blurring the Lines Between Friend and Foe

An anti-poppy poster in Afghanistan. Photo by Todd Huffman / CC BY 2.0 (Photo unmodified)


Counternarcotics have a history of controversy and importance in Afghanistan, and efforts to implement them alongside counterinsurgency doctrines are analysed in this article. The author suggests that justifications for such hybrid doctrines, in the form of links between narco-traffickers and insurgents, are tenuous and exaggerated. Additionally, the implementation of such doctrines comes at a severe cost for parallel efforts to gain local support. These claims are made alongside an examination of the economic reasoning behind poppy cultivation, misguided priorities in counternarcotics targeting and the backlash that such efforts elicit in a significant section of the population. As such, a policy of embedding counternarcotics task forces with counterinsurgency forces is at best counterproductive, and likely strengthens local insurgency movements.

Read the full Analysis Paper here:

“Narco-Terrorism”: Blurring the Lines Between Friend and Foe


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s